Java Design Pattern

Java design patterns are best practices used to solve common software design problems. They provide a way to organize code to make it more efficient, maintainable, and scalable. Here’s an overview of some common design patterns in Java:

1. Creational Patterns

Ø Singleton: Ensures a class has only one instance and provides a global point of access to it.

Ø Factory Method: Creates objects without specifying the exact class of object that will be created. Defines an interface for creating an object, but lets subclasses alter the type of objects that will be created.

Ø Abstract Factory: Provides an interface for creating families of related or dependent objects without specifying their concrete classes.

Ø Builder: Separates the construction of a complex object from its representation so that the same construction process can create different representations.

Ø Prototype: Creates new objects by copying an existing object, known as a prototype.

2. Structural Patterns

Ø Adapter: Allows incompatible interfaces to work together by wrapping an existing class with a new interface.

Ø Decorator: Adds new functionality to an object dynamically without altering its structure.

Ø Facade: Provides a simplified interface to a complex subsystem.

Ø Proxy: Provides a surrogate or placeholder for another object to control access to it.

Ø Composite: Composes objects into tree structures to represent part-whole hierarchies. It lets clients treat individual objects and compositions uniformly.

Ø Bridge Decouples an abstraction from its implementation so that the two can vary independently.

Ø Flyweight Reduces the cost of creating and manipulating a large number of similar objects by sharing objects where possible.

3. Behavioral Patterns

Ø Strategy: Defines a family of algorithms, encapsulates each one, and makes them interchangeable. The strategy pattern lets the algorithm vary independently from clients that use it.

Ø Observer: Defines a one-to-many dependency between objects so that when one object changes state, all its dependents are notified and updated automatically.

Ø Command: Encapsulates a request as an object, thereby allowing for parameterization of clients with queues, requests, and operations.

Ø State: Allows an object to alter its behavior when its internal state changes. The object will appear to change its class.

Ø Template Method: Defines the skeleton of an algorithm in the superclass but lets subclasses override specific steps of the algorithm without changing its structure.

Ø Chain of Responsibility: Passes a request along a chain of handlers, allowing each handler to process the request or pass it to the next handler.

Ø Interpreter: Defines a grammatical representation for a language and provides an interpreter to interpret sentences in the language. It is useful when you want to evaluate expressions in a language or when the grammar is simple and well-understood

Ø Iterator: Provides a way to access the elements of an aggregate object sequentially without exposing its underlying representation.

Ø Mediator: Defines an object that encapsulates how a set of objects interact, promoting loose coupling by keeping objects from referring to each other explicitly.

Ø Memento: Captures and externalizes an object's internal state so that it can be restored later, without violating encapsulation.

Ø Visitor: Represents an operation to be performed on the elements of an object structure, allowing you to define a new operation without changing the classes of the elements on which it operates.

4. Concurrency Patterns

Ø Thread Pool: Manages a pool of worker threads to efficiently execute tasks in parallel.

Ø Future: Represents the result of an asynchronous computation, providing methods to check if the computation is complete, to wait for its completion, and to retrieve the result.

Ø Producer-Consumer: Separates the creation of tasks (producer) from the execution of tasks (consumer) using a queue.

Ø Read-Write Lock: Allows multiple threads to read a shared resource concurrently but requires exclusive access for writes, preventing conflicts.

5. Architectural Patterns

These patterns provide general solutions for software architecture problems.

Ø Model-View-Controller (MVC)

Separates an application into three interconnected components: the Model (data), the View (UI), and the Controller (logic), allowing separation of concerns and independent development of components.

Ø Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM)

· Similar to MVC, but adds a ViewModel to handle the presentation logic, binding the View and the Model.

Ø Data Access Object (DAO)

Provides an abstract interface to a database or other persistence mechanism, separating the persistence logic from the business logic.

6. Other Patterns

Ø Null Object

· Provides a default behavior when an object is absent or null, avoiding null references.

Ø Service Locator

· Provides a centralized registry for services, making it easy to find and use service instances.

Creating a hierarchical overview of Java design patterns

Creating a hierarchical overview of Java design patterns using a flowchart along with corresponding Java examples involves organizing the patterns into categories and illustrating their relationships in a flowchart format. Below is a conceptual flowchart representation along with simplified Java code examples for each pattern category.

Flowchart: Hierarchical Overview of Java Design Patterns

Java Design Patterns

Java Code Examples

1. Creational Patterns

a. Singleton Pattern

java

public class Singleton {

private static Singleton instance;

private Singleton() {

// private constructor to prevent instantiation

}

public static Singleton getInstance() {

if (instance == null) {

instance = new Singleton();

}

return instance;

}

b. Factory Method Pattern

java

interface Product {

void use();

}

class ConcreteProductA implements Product {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product A");

}

class ConcreteProductB implements Product {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product B");

}

abstract class Creator {

public abstract Product factoryMethod();

public void someOperation() {

Product product = factoryMethod();

product.use();

}

class ConcreteCreatorA extends Creator {

public Product factoryMethod() {

return new ConcreteProductA();

}

class ConcreteCreatorB extends Creator {

public Product factoryMethod() {

return new ConcreteProductB();

}

c. Abstract Factory Pattern

java

interface AbstractFactory {

ProductA createProductA();

ProductB createProductB();

}

class ConcreteFactory1 implements AbstractFactory {

public ProductA createProductA() {

return new ProductA1();

}

public ProductB createProductB() {

return new ProductB1();

}

class ConcreteFactory2 implements AbstractFactory {

public ProductA createProductA() {

return new ProductA2();

}

public ProductB createProductB() {

return new ProductB2();

}

interface ProductA {

void use();

}

class ProductA1 implements ProductA {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product A1");

}

class ProductA2 implements ProductA {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product A2");

}

interface ProductB {

void use();

}

class ProductB1 implements ProductB {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product B1");

}

class ProductB2 implements ProductB {

public void use() {

System.out.println("Using Product B2");

}

2. Structural Patterns

a. Adapter Pattern

java

interface Target {

void request();

}

class Adaptee {

void specificRequest() {

System.out.println("Specific request");

}

class Adapter implements Target {

private Adaptee adaptee;

public Adapter(Adaptee adaptee) {

this.adaptee = adaptee;

}

public void request() {

adaptee.specificRequest();

}

b. Decorator Pattern

java

interface Component {

void operation();

}

class ConcreteComponent implements Component {

public void operation() {

System.out.println("Operation in ConcreteComponent");

}

abstract class Decorator implements Component {

protected Component component;

public Decorator(Component component) {

this.component = component;

}

public void operation() {

component.operation();

}

class ConcreteDecorator extends Decorator {

public ConcreteDecorator(Component component) {

super(component);

}

public void operation() {

super.operation();

System.out.println("Added behavior in ConcreteDecorator");

}

c. Composite Pattern

java

import java.util.ArrayList;

import java.util.List;

interface Component {

void operation();

}

class Leaf implements Component {

public void operation() {

System.out.println("Operation in Leaf");

}

class Composite implements Component {

private List<Component> children = new ArrayList<>();

public void add(Component component) {

children.add(component);

}

public void remove(Component component) {

children.remove(component);

}

public void operation() {

for (Component child : children) {

child.operation();

}

3. Behavioral Patterns

a. Strategy Pattern

java

interface Strategy {

void execute();

}

class ConcreteStrategyA implements Strategy {

public void execute() {

System.out.println("Executing Strategy A");

}

class ConcreteStrategyB implements Strategy {

public void execute() {

System.out.println("Executing Strategy B");

}

class Context {

private Strategy strategy;

public void setStrategy(Strategy strategy) {

this.strategy = strategy;

}

public void executeStrategy() {

strategy.execute();

}

b. Observer Pattern

java

import java.util.ArrayList;

import java.util.List;

interface Observer {

void update();

}

class ConcreteObserver implements Observer {

public void update() {

System.out.println("Observer updated");

}

class Subject {

private List<Observer> observers = new ArrayList<>();

public void attach(Observer observer) {

observers.add(observer);

}

public void detach(Observer observer) {

observers.remove(observer);

}

public void notifyObservers() {

for (Observer observer : observers) {

observer.update();

}

c. Command Pattern

java

interface Command {

void execute();

}

class ConcreteCommand implements Command {

private Receiver receiver;

public ConcreteCommand(Receiver receiver) {

this.receiver = receiver;

}

public void execute() {

receiver.action();

}

class Receiver {

public void action() {

System.out.println("Action executed");

}

class Invoker {

private Command command;

public void setCommand(Command command) {

this.command = command;

}

public void executeCommand() {

command.execute();

}

d. Chain of Responsibility

java

abstract class Logger {

public static int DEBUG = 1;

public static int INFO = 2;

public static int ERROR = 3;

protected int level;

// Next element in the chain of responsibility

protected Logger nextLogger;

public void setNextLogger(Logger nextLogger) {

this.nextLogger = nextLogger;

}

public void logMessage(int level, String message) {

if (this.level <= level) {

write(message);

}

if (nextLogger != null) {

nextLogger.logMessage(level, message);

}

protected abstract void write(String message);

}

class DebugLogger extends Logger {

public DebugLogger(int level) {

this.level = level;

}

@Override

protected void write(String message) {

System.out.println("DEBUG Logger: " + message);

}

class InfoLogger extends Logger {

public InfoLogger(int level) {

this.level = level;

}

@Override

protected void write(String message) {

System.out.println("INFO Logger: " + message);

}

class ErrorLogger extends Logger {

public ErrorLogger(int level) {

this.level = level;

}

@Override

protected void write(String message) {

System.out.println("ERROR Logger: " + message);

}

class ChainPatternDemo {

private static Logger getChainOfLoggers() {

Logger errorLogger = new ErrorLogger(Logger.ERROR);

Logger infoLogger = new InfoLogger(Logger.INFO);

Logger debugLogger = new DebugLogger(Logger.DEBUG);

// Setting up the chain: DebugLogger -> InfoLogger -> ErrorLogger

debugLogger.setNextLogger(infoLogger);

infoLogger.setNextLogger(errorLogger);

return debugLogger;

}

public static void main(String[] args) {

Logger loggerChain = getChainOfLoggers();

loggerChain.logMessage(Logger.DEBUG, "This is a debug level information.");

loggerChain.logMessage(Logger.INFO, "This is an info level information.");

loggerChain.logMessage(Logger.ERROR, "This is an error level information.");

}

Explanation

Logger Chain: We set up a chain of loggers (DebugLogger -> InfoLogger -> ErrorLogger) where each logger checks the message level and decides whether to handle it.
logMessage Method: The logMessage method checks if the current logger can handle the message. If yes, it logs the message. If not, it passes the message to the next logger in the chain.
Flexibility: The Chain of Responsibility pattern makes it easy to add new types of loggers or change the chain order without modifying existing classes.

e. interpreter

interface Expression {

int interpret();

}

class NumberExpression implements Expression {

private int number;

public NumberExpression(int number) {

this.number = number;

}

public NumberExpression(String number) {

this.number = Integer.parseInt(number);

}

@Override

public int interpret() {

return this.number;

}

class AddExpression implements Expression {

private Expression leftExpression;

private Expression rightExpression;

public AddExpression(Expression leftExpression, Expression rightExpression) {

this.leftExpression = leftExpression;

this.rightExpression = rightExpression;

}

@Override

public int interpret() {

return leftExpression.interpret() + rightExpression.interpret();

}

class SubtractExpression implements Expression {

private Expression leftExpression;

private Expression rightExpression;

public SubtractExpression(Expression leftExpression, Expression rightExpression) {

this.leftExpression = leftExpression;

this.rightExpression = rightExpression;

}

@Override

public int interpret() {

return leftExpression.interpret() - rightExpression.interpret();

}

import java.util.Stack;

class InterpreterClient {

public static Expression parse(String expression) {

Stack<Expression> stack = new Stack<>();

String[] tokens = expression.split(" ");

for (String token : tokens) {

if (isOperator(token)) {

Expression rightExpression = stack.pop();

Expression leftExpression = stack.pop();

Expression operator = getOperator(token, leftExpression, rightExpression);

int result = operator.interpret();

stack.push(new NumberExpression(result));

} else {

stack.push(new NumberExpression(token));

}

return stack.pop();

}

private static boolean isOperator(String token) {

return token.equals("+") || token.equals("-");

}

private static Expression getOperator(String token, Expression left, Expression right) {

switch (token) {

case "+":

return new AddExpression(left, right);

case "-":

return new SubtractExpression(left, right);

default:

throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Unknown operator: " + token);

}

public class InterpreterPatternDemo {

public static void main(String[] args) {

String expression = "7 3 - 2 1 + +"; // (7 - 3) + (2 + 1)

Expression result = InterpreterClient.parse(expression);

System.out.println(expression + " = " + result.interpret());

}

G: output

7 3 - 2 1 + + = 7

Explanation

Expression Interface: Defines a method interpret() that is implemented by all concrete expressions.
Concrete Expressions:

NumberExpression handles numbers.
AddExpression and SubtractExpression handle addition and subtraction, respectively.

Interpreter Client: The InterpreterClient class parses a postfix expression (where operators follow their operands) and uses a stack to evaluate the expression using the interpreter classes.
Postfix Expression: The expression "7 3 - 2 1 + +" represents the mathematical expression (7−3)+(2+1)(7 - 3) + (2 + 1)(7−3)+(2+1).

Use Case

The Interpreter pattern is suitable for scenarios where the grammar is simple and stable, and the language to be interpreted is small.
Examples include interpreting mathematical expressions, parsing simple configuration files, or evaluating conditions in rule engines.

4. Concurrency Patterns

a. Thread Pool Pattern

java

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;

class Task implements Runnable {

public void run() {

System.out.println("Task executed by " + Thread.currentThread().getName());

}

public class ThreadPoolExample {

public static void main(String[] args) {

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

executor.execute(new Task());

}

executor.shutdown();

}

b. Producer-Consumer Pattern

java

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;

class Task implements Runnable {

public void run() {

System.out.println("Task executed by " + Thread.currentThread().getName());

}

public class ThreadPoolExample {

public static void main(String[] args) {

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

executor.execute(new Task());

}

executor.shutdown();

}

c. Future Pattern

java

import java.util.concurrent.Callable;

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;

import java.util.concurrent.Future;

class Task implements Callable<String> {

public String call() throws Exception {

Thread.sleep(2000);

return "Task completed";

}

public class FutureExample {

public static void main(String[] args) {

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);

Future<String> future = executor.submit(new Task());

try {

System.out.println("Result: " + future.get());

} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException e) {

e.printStackTrace();

}

executor.shutdown();

}

Difference between Java Design Patterns and SOLID principles

Java Design Patterns and SOLID principles are both essential concepts in software design, but they serve different purposes and operate at different levels of abstraction. Here’s a breakdown of their differences:

1. Purpose

Java Design Patterns:

Design patterns are typical solutions to common problems in software design. They are proven templates that can be adapted to solve specific design issues in your code.
Examples include Singleton, Factory Method, Observer, and Decorator.
Design patterns provide solutions to recurring problems and guide the structure and interaction of classes and objects.

SOLID Principles:

SOLID principles are a set of guidelines for writing clean, maintainable, and scalable code. They help in ensuring that the code is flexible, easy to understand, and less prone to bugs.
SOLID stands for:

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

These principles focus on designing individual classes and systems in a way that they are more robust and easier to manage.

2. Level of Abstraction

Java Design Patterns:

Operate at a higher level of abstraction.
They are more about the architecture or structure of an entire system or a subsystem.
Design patterns describe how classes and objects interact to solve a specific problem in a certain context.

SOLID Principles:

Operate at a lower level of abstraction.
They guide the design of individual classes and their interactions.
SOLID principles are about writing good class-level code that is easy to maintain and extend.

3. Scope

Java Design Patterns:

Applied to solve specific problems within a given scope, such as creating objects (Factory Method), managing object behavior (Observer), or structuring classes (Decorator).
Design patterns can be applied to various parts of the application, depending on where the design issue occurs.

SOLID Principles:

Applied universally across all parts of the codebase to ensure the code is flexible, modular, and easily understandable.
SOLID principles are the foundation for good object-oriented design practices and are not tied to specific problems but are general principles to follow.

4. Reusability

Java Design Patterns:

Provide reusable solutions to recurring design problems.
Patterns can be reused across different projects or systems whenever similar design problems arise.

SOLID Principles:

Ensure that individual components of the system are reusable.
By following SOLID principles, the classes you write are more likely to be reusable in different contexts because they adhere to good design practices.

5. Example Comparison

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) from SOLID:

A class should have only one reason to change, meaning it should have only one job or responsibility.
For instance, if you have a class responsible for both data validation and saving data to the database, SRP would suggest splitting these responsibilities into two separate classes.

Factory Method Pattern:

Provides an interface for creating objects in a super class, but allows subclasses to alter the type of objects that will be created.
The Factory Method pattern can be implemented in a way that adheres to the Open/Closed Principle (OCP), another SOLID principle, by allowing the creation of objects to be extended without modifying existing code.

6. Interrelation

Java Design Patterns and SOLID Principles:

Design patterns often embody SOLID principles. For example, the Strategy Pattern aligns with the Open/Closed Principle by allowing behavior to be chosen at runtime without modifying existing code.
Implementing design patterns can help you adhere to SOLID principles, but it is also possible to misuse them in ways that violate SOLID principles.

Summary

ü Java Design Patterns provide solutions to specific design problems by defining the structure and interaction between classes and objects.

ü SOLID Principles guide the design of individual classes and their interactions to ensure the codebase is robust, maintainable, and scalable.

ü They complement each other: design patterns often implement SOLID principles, and adhering to SOLID principles makes it easier to implement design patterns effectively.

Why IDEALS?

IDEALS addresses challenges in modern cloud-native development that SOLID principles might not fully encompass due to the complexities of distributed and highly scalable systems. It promotes principles such as independence, reactivity, and fault tolerance, which are vital in the age of microservices and cloud computing.

The IDEALS design pattern is an acronym-based approach used in software development, primarily focused on designing cloud-native applications. It is a successor to SOLID, emphasizing modern, distributed systems and microservices architecture. It provides principles that help build scalable, maintainable, and fault-tolerant systems.

IDEALS Acronym

I - Interface Segregation
Similar to the SOLID principle, this emphasizes creating small, specific interfaces for different clients instead of a large general-purpose interface. This is crucial in distributed systems, where breaking apart tightly coupled interfaces reduces complexity.
D - Deployability
Services should be easy to deploy independently. This principle focuses on minimizing dependencies between components, enabling faster and safer deployment cycles. Practices like containerization and CI/CD pipelines are essential for achieving this.
E - Event-Driven
Systems should use event-driven architectures to promote loose coupling. By using events as the primary mode of communication, services can react asynchronously, improving responsiveness and scalability.
A - Availability over Consistency
In distributed systems, prioritizing availability (ensuring the system is operational) often makes more sense than strict consistency. This principle aligns with the CAP theorem's trade-offs in cloud environments.
L - Loose Coupling
Services and components should be designed to minimize interdependence. This ensures that changes to one part of the system do not cascade into others, enhancing maintainability and scalability.
S - Single Responsibility
Each service or component should have one clearly defined responsibility. This promotes clarity in design, simplifies debugging, and aligns with the microservices philosophy.

Correlation Between SOLID and IDEALS Principles

Both SOLID and IDEALS serve as foundational principles in software design, though they target slightly different domains:

Ø SOLID: Focuses on object-oriented programming (OOP) principles for designing maintainable and scalable classes within an application.

Ø IDEALS: Expands on these ideas for distributed systems and cloud-native architectures, addressing challenges like scalability, fault tolerance, and microservice independence.

Let’s explore their correlation and how IDEALS builds upon SOLID.

Direct Correlation Between SOLID and IDEALS Principles

1. I - Interface Segregation (SOLID) and I - Interface Segregation (IDEALS)

Ø SOLID ISP: Ensure classes have minimal, specific interfaces to avoid forcing unnecessary methods on clients.

Ø IDEALS ISP: Adapts this for distributed systems by promoting modular API or service designs, reducing coupling between microservices or components.

Example:
In SOLID, we split a class interface into smaller, client-specific interfaces.
In IDEALS, this extends to API design, ensuring services (e.g., REST APIs, gRPC) expose focused contracts tailored to their clients, avoiding "fat" APIs.

2. D - Dependency Inversion (SOLID) and D - Deployability (IDEALS)

Ø SOLID DIP: Classes should depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations, promoting flexibility and decoupling.

Ø IDEALS Deployability: Services are designed to be independently deployable, leveraging modularity enabled by SOLID principles.

Example:
In SOLID, a payment service depends on a PaymentGateway interface, not a specific implementation (e.g., Stripe, PayPal).
In IDEALS, this abstraction ensures each payment provider is a separate microservice, deployable independently without breaking the others.

3. S - Single Responsibility Principle (SOLID) and S - Single Responsibility (IDEALS)

Ø SOLID SRP: A class should have one reason to change, focusing on a single responsibility.

Ø IDEALS SRP: Extends this to services, ensuring each service (or microservice) handles one responsibility within the system.

Example:
In SOLID, a ReportGenerator class only generates reports, delegating database interactions to another class.
In IDEALS, a Reporting Service only handles report generation, delegating storage to a Storage Service.

4. Open/Closed Principle (SOLID) and E - Event-Driven (IDEALS)

Ø SOLID OCP: Classes should be open for extension but closed for modification.

Ø IDEALS Event-Driven: Event-driven systems enable extension by allowing new services to subscribe to events without modifying the original service.

Example:
In SOLID, extending a shape class to add new shapes without modifying existing ones.
In IDEALS, extending a system by subscribing a new service to an OrderPlaced event without modifying the Order Service.

5. L - Liskov Substitution Principle (SOLID) and L - Loose Coupling (IDEALS)

Ø SOLID LSP: Subtypes should be replaceable with their parent types without altering behavior.

Ø IDEALS Loose Coupling: Promotes decoupling services or components, allowing them to interact seamlessly without tightly binding implementations.

Example:
In SOLID, a Rectangle class can replace its parent Shape in any context.
In IDEALS, a service using a Product API should function regardless of whether it's a REST API, gRPC, or GraphQL, as long as the interface contract is met.

IDEALS Expands Beyond SOLID

While there is significant overlap, IDEALS introduces principles specifically tailored for distributed systems and cloud-native design:

Ø E - Event-Driven: SOLID doesn't explicitly address communication patterns like event-driven systems, but IDEALS emphasizes it for decoupling services in distributed environments.

Ø A - Availability over Consistency: While SOLID focuses on correctness in class design, IDEALS acknowledges trade-offs (e.g., CAP theorem) in distributed systems to prioritize availability in cloud architectures.

Ø D - Deployability: SOLID promotes modularity at a class level, while IDEALS emphasizes it at a service level, ensuring independent deployments.

Summary of Correlation

SOLID Principle	Related IDEALS Principle	Key Connection
Single Responsibility (SRP)	Single Responsibility	Both ensure modularity and clear separation of concerns.
Open/Closed (OCP)	Event-Driven	Both encourage extending functionality without modifying existing components.
Liskov Substitution (LSP)	Loose Coupling	Both prioritize flexibility and compatibility in their respective domains.
Interface Segregation (ISP)	Interface Segregation	Both emphasize specific, focused interfaces to reduce unnecessary dependencies.
Dependency Inversion (DIP)	Deployability	Both enable modular systems by ensuring independence at class or service levels.

By extending SOLID principles to the service and system level, IDEALS addresses the challenges of scalability, availability, and fault tolerance inherent in distributed systems. Together, they offer a cohesive roadmap for designing both robust applications and cloud-native architectures.

IDEALS Design Pattern with Examples and Java Code

Here’s a practical explanation of each principle in the IDEALS pattern with examples and Java code snippets.

1. Interface Segregation

Design interfaces tailored for specific clients rather than one large interface.

Example: Payment System

Bad Example (Violating Interface Segregation)

A single interface forces all clients to implement all methods, even if they're irrelevant.

java

interface Payment {

void processCreditCardPayment();

void processPayPalPayment();

void processCryptoPayment();

}

// A class that doesn't need all methods is still forced to implement them.

class CreditCardPaymentProcessor implements Payment {

@Override

public void processCreditCardPayment() {

System.out.println("Processing credit card payment...");

}

@Override

public void processPayPalPayment() {

throw new UnsupportedOperationException("PayPal not supported.");

}

@Override

public void processCryptoPayment() {

throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Crypto not supported.");

}

Here, clients are forced to implement unnecessary methods, leading to poor design and potential runtime errors.

Good Example (Applying Interface Segregation)

Split the interface into smaller, more specific ones.

java

// Separate interfaces for each payment type

interface CreditCardPayment {

void processCreditCardPayment();

}

interface PayPalPayment {

void processPayPalPayment();

}

interface CryptoPayment {

void processCryptoPayment();

}

// Only implement relevant methods

class CreditCardPaymentProcessor implements CreditCardPayment {

@Override

public void processCreditCardPayment() {

System.out.println("Processing credit card payment...");

}

class PayPalPaymentProcessor implements PayPalPayment {

@Override

public void processPayPalPayment() {

System.out.println("Processing PayPal payment...");

}

Now, each processor implements only the methods it needs, adhering to Interface Segregation

2. Deployability

Design services for independent deployment to minimize downtime and simplify updates.

Example

Using Spring Boot, create a standalone microservice for managing orders.

java

@SpringBootApplication

@RestController

public class OrderService {

public static void main(String[] args) {

SpringApplication.run(OrderService.class, args);

}

@GetMapping("/orders/{id}")

public String getOrder(@PathVariable String id) {

return "Order details for ID: " + id;

}

This service can be packaged as a Docker container for independent deployment:

Dockerfile:

FROM openjdk:17

COPY target/order-service.jar order-service.jar

ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-jar", "order-service.jar"]

Build and deploy this service independently using containerization tools.

3. Event-Driven

Use events for communication to achieve loose coupling and reactivity.

Example

Using Spring Boot and Kafka for event-driven communication.

Producer Service:

java

@RestController

public class EventProducer {

@Autowired

private KafkaTemplate<String, String> kafkaTemplate;

@PostMapping("/publish")

public String publishEvent(@RequestParam String message) {

kafkaTemplate.send("order_events", message);

return "Event published!";

}

Consumer Service:

java

@KafkaListener(topics = "order_events", groupId = "order_group")

public void consumeEvent(String message) {

System.out.println("Received event: " + message);

}

4. Availability over Consistency

Design systems prioritizing availability while handling consistency asynchronously using CAP theorem.

Example

Using eventual consistency for order updates in a distributed system.

Order Service:

java

class OrderService {

private Map<String, String> orders = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

public void createOrder(String id, String details) {

orders.put(id, details);

simulateAsyncConsistencyUpdate(id);

}

private void simulateAsyncConsistencyUpdate(String id) {

new Thread(() -> {

try {

Thread.sleep(5000); // Simulate delay

System.out.println("Order consistency updated for ID: " + id);

} catch (InterruptedException e) {

e.printStackTrace();

}

}).start();

}

5. Loose Coupling

Minimize dependencies between components using dependency injection or interfaces.

Example

Using Spring Boot's dependency injection:

java

@Component

class NotificationService {

public void sendNotification(String message) {

System.out.println("Notification sent: " + message);

}

@RestController

class OrderController {

private final NotificationService notificationService;

@Autowired

public OrderController(NotificationService notificationService) {

this.notificationService = notificationService;

}

@PostMapping("/order")

public String createOrder(@RequestParam String order) {

notificationService.sendNotification("Order created: " + order);

return "Order created!";

}

6. Single Responsibility

Ensure each class or service has one responsibility.

Example

Separating payment logic from order processing.

java

class PaymentProcessor {

public void processPayment(String orderId) {

System.out.println("Processing payment for order: " + orderId);

}

class OrderProcessor {

private final PaymentProcessor paymentProcessor;

public OrderProcessor(PaymentProcessor paymentProcessor) {

this.paymentProcessor = paymentProcessor;

}

public void processOrder(String orderId) {

System.out.println("Processing order: " + orderId);

paymentProcessor.processPayment(orderId);

}

Conclusion

The IDEALS pattern guides modern application design, emphasizing modularity, scalability, and maintainability. These examples in Java demonstrate how to apply each principle effectively in a cloud-native or microservices context.

Would you like further details or additional examples for any specific principle?

Would you like deeper insights into specific IDEALS principles or a combined example showcasing both?

For More Spring Related information, visit

Ø Mastering Debounce, Throttle, Rate Limit & Backoff in Java

Ø Deep understand of ThrottlingFilter with RewritePath filter in cloud gateway

Ø Setting up Custom Filters using Debouncing, Throttling, Rate Limiting, and Exponential Backoff

Ø Custom gateway filters in Spring Cloud Gateway

Ø Custom Filters in Microservices

Ø Mastering Debounce, Throttle, Rate Limit & Backoff in Java

Ø Microservices: Custom Filters for Debouncing, Throttling, Rate Limits & Backoff

Ø Spring Cloud Gateway uses a RewritePath filter

Ø How to call rest api from java code